Rilke and Plath; Numbers and Arts
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In relation
to ‘solitude’, Rainer Maria Rilke writes about the aspects of solitude, such as
it leads to the discovery of personhood and acceptance of feelings like pain, sadness,
anxiety, depression etc; former, as he writes in one of his correspondences with
a friend about his meeting with his mother. Lewis Hyde describes the correspondence
as consisting of the description of sympathetic intelligence [1] where one ‘inwardly’, which
might mean sub-consciously, completes someone’s gestures. The concept of ‘inwardness’
becomes coherent as Hyde describes that Rilke’s ability to identify with others
led to the ramification of losing his own identity. Thus, solitude for the
discovery of personhood.
Latter, as Rilke believed that art requires an artist
to accept such emotions instead of attempting to avoid it by being constantly
attempting to interact with others & become social as it is not possible to
achieve; thus, the state of mind as sadness should not be wallowed over as
though a ‘curse’ but converted into a ‘blessing’ by engaging with art.
![]() |
| Solitude |
One of the aspects of solitude transpires after successfully accepting solitude. In the first letter to his friend, Kappus, Rilke writes about the ‘most inconsequential and slightest hour’. The basic concept behind it is that a solitary person loses awareness of time as dictated and trained by clocks. An artist must lose touch with numbers, calculation and counting. Perhaps, this is why an artist sees a phenomenon unfold and not as distributed in the counts of stages. With the help from this concept, a much-sought answer finds leads- ‘Does the desire to do a work which had once been a passion and now a duty, fades away?’ Rilke suggests that withdrawing from mechanical time spreads temporality in form of eternity and haste is eliminated. Thus, creative desires, at least for an artist, might sustain.
However, I
wonder if creative desires are not associated with love and the happiness that
springs out of it. The relation is bidirectional, creation seems to stimulate
happiness & happiness felt from love particularly leads to a desire to
create. For instance, buying arguments from Sylvia Plath, one might argue in TheBell Jar, depression not only snatches away the desire to create (reproduction
in this case) but also the capability to do so (although, Esther Greenwood in the
novel seems to choose diaphragm birth control voluntarily). I believe that it
is established that reproduction, ideally, is a creation out of love.
The
creative desires as discussed by Rilke are existential in nature. One of the concerns of existentialists, thinking of Camus's Sisyphus is to let us keep the stone rolling and not think of the time or when will it cease. Well, an
existentialist like Rilke does not delve into moral discussions. It makes their
method of carrying out work different from Kantian deontology. The two might be
misconstrued as similar as none of the two identify with the joy of carrying
out work but for the sake of it. However, for Kant, the work shall be a duty
that is categorical and has its roots in morals. An existentialist just goes
on and on towards eternity like Sisyphus.
[1]
Sympathetic intelligence is
deciding the course of action and behaviour in response to our surrounding at a
moment.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments


This blog is a gem. It reaffirms my belief that the writer is somewhere in the genius spectrum. "Solitude for the discovery of personhood."
ReplyDeleteI am honoured.
Delete